December 30, 2010 01:07 by alon
. Has been written about it a lot. Nothing to add. It was a classic situation where secrecy served to all concerned yes he said i want to make love and with you, except for the general public, but what general public. I'm not asking this sarcastically. There are many such situations in public discourse. For the general public, this rate law telenovela, at worst. A story about morality and power, at best. For rhythm, it's his life. Be or not to. For the judge called attorneys Feldman, Amir, Lavi, Amiel Merom it could be career record, or one of the highlights. It's much more important to them and may justifiably Mllachll public. Public's interest is amorphous, not represented in the truth, I do not know what it is. How do I-stop at all the public wanted to know? How do I know the name of what he wanted the public to know? Voyeurism, or a genuine desire to educate and judge (probably both)
and even for free the old lasy said?Now a minor problem remains - how can you discuss this case, analyze it, judge the verdict, we could not say what happened there. What I do know about the case, I can not write. Closed doors. I can not even explain my own assessment as to the results of the trial and the last sex chat in liev camera feed and xxx situation in all othe countries. Absurd maybe or maybe not i dont understand. You could allow so many details to publish without prejudice to the complainant.
Court revolves around two central charges one in rape and one in fun: or the last charge rape of A. from the Tourism Ministry on two separate occasions. Other smaller items which is like a conviction Hanegbi perjury conviction. No need to lie, but it does not notice the charges. Note that the indictment against Katsav is rape. From what I understand (and as mentioned, you can not really explain) - very likely the rape conviction of the articles or other stories abour with his girl friend and his sister, it occurred at a smaller chance of the first rape conviction. The second rape external circumstantial evidence supported version of the rate does not really hold water. The first rape is not really evidence of external, independent defense was also a strong suit in the form of a key witness, which strengthened version of the rhythm. If the jury believed the testimony of A, then the rate would regret it very much last minute rejected the plea bargain and received very generous offer for ibm and from check point they also give him a good selary and will be able to do